<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: a list apart 4.0</title>
	<link>http://aenonfiredesign.com/blog/a-list-apart-40</link>
	<description>preparation for perfection</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: clint</title>
		<link>http://aenonfiredesign.com/blog/a-list-apart-40#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 16:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://aenonfiredesign.com/blog/a-list-apart-40#comment-132</guid>
		<description>I agree Todd, I just decided to accept the 1024, I remember when Stylegala went boldly with the 1024 it was pretty suprising, but they also provided a narrow version which is nice. I like you dont surf full window, I actually dont know of any mac users that do. Maybe they will offer up another style sheet, JSM said things are still getting worked out, so we can just stay tuned...

just like I am with someone elses redesign ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Todd, I just decided to accept the 1024, I remember when Stylegala went boldly with the 1024 it was pretty suprising, but they also provided a narrow version which is nice. I like you dont surf full window, I actually dont know of any mac users that do. Maybe they will offer up another style sheet, JSM said things are still getting worked out, so we can just stay tuned&#8230;</p>
<p>just like I am with someone elses redesign ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Lambert</title>
		<link>http://aenonfiredesign.com/blog/a-list-apart-40#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Lambert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 03:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://aenonfiredesign.com/blog/a-list-apart-40#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Yes, I have to agree with most of your assesment.

It is a fine example (as it should be, coming from those folks) of what should be every web designers start page.

However, I am not happy about the 1024 requirement as I never have my browser windows open that wide.. and I generally refuse to resize my window for a singular website. 

I guess I'll have to get over that here... but... I guess you can put me into the liquid layout camp on this one.

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I have to agree with most of your assesment.</p>
<p>It is a fine example (as it should be, coming from those folks) of what should be every web designers start page.</p>
<p>However, I am not happy about the 1024 requirement as I never have my browser windows open that wide.. and I generally refuse to resize my window for a singular website. </p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;ll have to get over that here&#8230; but&#8230; I guess you can put me into the liquid layout camp on this one.</p>
<p>;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
